- AutoGPT Newsletter
- Posts
- The New OpenAI Agent Builder Wasn’t Made For You
The New OpenAI Agent Builder Wasn’t Made For You

Hey, Joey here.
I called it 2 weeks ago, and now the new n8n “prompt-to-workflow” feature is live.
Well give it a go, it’s actually even better than I thought…
But this week, we’re covering some thoughts on the new OpenAI Agent Builder.
Here’s what I’ve got for you:
📌 Resource: We might see the AI bubble pop sooner than you think
📌 Resource: Reddit is not worried about the new AI search wave
📌 Deep Dive: My take on the new Open AI Agent Builder
Let’s dive in 👇
WEEKLY PICKS
🗞️ Quick Reads:

DEEP DIVE
The New OpenAI Agent Builder Wasn’t Made For You
The internet called OpenAI’s new Agent Builder an “n8n killer” the day it dropped.
And I get it (kinda).
This really could have been a Zapier-meets-GPT moment, and many wanted this so bad that they tried to imagine it into existence…
Because… it’s not.
Why? Because here’s the truth: this thing wasn’t built for you.
Not for small business owners.
Not for indie builders.
And definitely not for the people who actually use automation tools to run their businesses.
OpenAI is basically Apple 2.0
They hand you the tools, cheer you on while you build, and then — once you find something people actually want — they launch their own version.
It’s like the App Store all over again, except this time, they own the models instead of the devices.
That’s what AgentKit feels like.
So what are people doing with it right now?
Let’s break it down:
Some folks are forcing automations into it that are 3x easier to build in n8n or Zapier.
Others think they cracked the code by connecting it back to Zapier to access 4,000+ apps. Which is like fixing a Bluetooth printer by plugging in a USB cable.
And then you’ve got the casual crowd calling it a “less complicated n8n,” which translates to: “It doesn’t really work, but hey — it’s honest work.”

Here’s the thing:
I’ve played with it. I’ve watched people push its limits.
And so far, I haven’t seen anything that justifies the hype, at least not for your average AI enthusiast or small business.
Because again: it wasn’t made for you.
It wasn’t made to compete with Zapier, n8n, or Make.
It was made to keep all of us inside OpenAI’s ecosystem.
What’s really going on
This is a distribution play.
OpenAI watched AI automations blow up across other tools and said,
“Cool idea. We’ll take it from here.”
AgentKit is step one in making sure your workflows, your agents, your little AI side hustles, live inside ChatGPT, not outside it.
Right now, it’s clunky and dev-heavy.
But give it a few updates and my guess is that you’ll be able to call these “agents” (spoiler: still not real agents) directly from the ChatGPT chat.
If you zoom out, AgentKit isn’t a competitor to no-code tools: it’s more like CustomGPTs 2.0.
And one more thing:
This tool wasn’t made for non-technical folks.
It shipped alongside the SDK for a reason. It’s built for devs who want to prototype logic before shipping it inside their own apps.
Just look at the UI:

If you showed this to a non-techy person, they’d think it’s the Matrix.
So yeah — call me underwhelmed.
AgentKit is cool in theory, but it’s not the automation revolution Twitter promised you.
But hey that’s just my take on it, I’m curious to know what you think of this new feature:
Have you actually built something useful with the new Agent Builder? |

THAT‘S A WRAP
Before you go: Here’s how I can help
1) Sponsor Us — Reach 250,000+ AI enthusiasts, developers, and entrepreneurs monthly. Let’s collaborate →
2) The AI Content Machine Challenge — Join our 28-Day Generative AI Mastery Course. Master ChatGPT, Midjourney, and more with 5-minute daily challenges. Start creating 10x faster →
See you next week,
— Joey Mazars, Online Education & AI Expert 🥐
PS: Forward this to a friend who’s curious about AI. They’ll thank you (and so will I).
What'd you think of today's email? |
Reply